On the grammatical aspects of radical scientific discovery
Baltas, Aristides
Philosophia Scientiae, Tome 8 (2004), p. 169-201 / Harvested from Numdam

La découverte scientifique radicale, et le changement radical de paradigme associé, sont traités ici comme découlant de la mise à jour de ce qu'on appelle des ‘assomptions' d'arrière-plan. Celles-ci sont considérées comme plus ou moins équivalentes aux ‘propositions charnières' discutées par Wittgenstein dans De la certitude. Sur cette base, diverses questions liées aux changements de signification, au changement théorique, à l'incommensurabilité, etc., sont discutées. On montre que la conception d'ensemble de Kuhn, une fois précisée, n'implique ni l'idéalisme ni le relativisme, et que la rationalité et le progrès scientifique peuvent être sauvés d'une manière acceptable par les scientifiques praticiens.

Radical scientific discovery and the associated radical “paradigm change” are treated here as following from the disclosure of what I call background ‘assumptions'. These are taken as more or less equivalent to the “hinge propositions” that Wittgenstein discusses in his On Certainty. On this basis, various issues connected to meaning variance, theory change, incommensurability and so forth, are discussed. It is shown that Kuhn's overall account need not, with qualifications, imply either idealism or relativism while rationality and scientific progress can be saved in a way that may be acceptable by practising scientists.

Publié le : 2004-01-01
@article{PHSC_2004__8_1_169_0,
     author = {Baltas, Aristides},
     title = {On the grammatical aspects of radical scientific discovery},
     journal = {Philosophia Scientiae},
     volume = {8},
     year = {2004},
     pages = {169-201},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/PHSC_2004__8_1_169_0}
}
Baltas, Aristides. On the grammatical aspects of radical scientific discovery. Philosophia Scientiae, Tome 8 (2004) pp. 169-201. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/PHSC_2004__8_1_169_0/

[1] Agazzi, E. (editor) 1997.- Realism and Quantum Physics, Amsterdam-Atlanta, Georgia: Rodopi. | MR 1652431

[2] Batens, D. and Van Bendegem, J.P. (editors) 1988.- Theory and Experiment, Recent Insights and New Perspectives on their Relation, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing Co.

[3] Baltas, Aristides 1988.- On the Structure of Physics as a Science

[4] Baltas, Aristides 1990.- Once Again on the Meaning of Physical Concepts

[5] Baltas, Aristides 1997.- Constraints and Resistance: Stating a Case for Negative Realism | MR 1652435

[6] Baltas, Aristides 2000.- Classifying Scientific Controversies

[7] Baltas, Aristides progress.- Physics as Self-Historiography in Actu: Identity Conditions for the Discipline. Draft available on request.

[8] Crary, A. and Read, R. (editors) 2000.- The New Wittgenstein, London and New York: Routledge.

[9] Damerow, P., Freudenthal G., Mclaughlin P. and Renn J. 1992.- Exploring the Limits of Pre-classical Mechanics, New York: Springer-Verlag.

[10] Earman, J. 1989.- World Enough and Space-Time, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. | MR 1031472

[11] Gavroglu, K. and Goudaroulis, G. 1989.- Concepts out of Context(s): The Development of Low Temperature Physics 18811957, Dordrecht, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2004,

[12] Kindi, Vasso forthcoming.- Kuhn and Wittgenstein: Philosophical Investigations on the Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.

[13] Kuhn, T. S. 1978.- Black Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity 1894-1912, Chicago, Ill.: The University of Chicago Press, 1978. | MR 571012

[14] Kuhn, T. S. 1981.- What are Scientific Revolutions

[15] Kuhn, T. S. 1983.- Commensurability, Compatibility, Communicability

[16] Kuhn, T. S. 2000.- Thomas S. Kuhn, the Road since Structure, Conant J. and Haugeland J. (editors), Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.

[17] Lakatos, Imre 1976.- Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. | MR 479916 | Zbl 0334.00022

[18] Machamer P., Pera M. and Baltas A. (editors) 2000.- Scientific Controversies, Oxford, U.K.: The Oxford University Press.

[19] Mcdowell, J. 1996.- Mind and World, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

[20] Morawetz, T. 1980.- Wittgenstein and Knowledge, Sussex, U. K.: The Harvester Press.

[21] Nasio, J.-D. 1992.- Cinq Leçons sur la Théorie de Jacques Lacan, Paris, France: Rivages.

[22] Nicolacopoulos, P. (editor) 1990.- Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2004

[23] Pagondiotis, K. (forthcoming).- Can the Perceptual be Conceptual and Non-Theory-Laden

[24] Pera, Marcel 1994.- The Discourses of Science, Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.

[25] Putnam, Hilary 2000.- Rethinking Mathematical Necessity

[26] Raftopoulos, A. (editor) (forthcoming).- Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: an Interdisciplinary Approach, New York: Nova Scotia Publishing Co.

[27] Weiner, J. 1990.- Frege in Perspective, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. | MR 1115212

[28] Wittgenstein Ludwig 1969.- On Certainty, G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright (editors), New York: Harper and Row Publishers.