Laws of nature, exceptions and tropes

Kistler, Max

Kistler, Max

Philosophia Scientiae, Tome 7 (2003), p. 189-219 / Harvested from Numdam

Access to full text
Full (PDF)
Full (DJVU)

Résumé
Abstract

Je propose une théorie réaliste des lois, en termes de “tropes” (ou instances de propriétés), qui évite les problèmes de “l'analyse du meilleur système” et le “problème de l'inférence” qui se pose au réalisme des universaux. J'analyse le concept de situation exceptionnelle, caractérisée comme une situation dans laquelle un objet particulier satisfait l'antécédent mais non le conséquent de la régularité associée à la loi, sans pour autant réfuter la loi. Pour tenir compte de cette possibilité, il faut concevoir les propriétés mises en relation par une loi, comme dispositionnelles et non nécessairement manifestes.

I propose a realist theory of laws formulated in terms of tropes (or property instances) that avoids both the problems of the “best-systems-analysis” and the “inference problem” of realism of universals. I analyze the concept of an exceptional situation, characterized as a situation in which a particular object satisfies the antecedent but not the consequent of the regularity associated with a law, without thereby falsifying that law. To take this possibility into account, the properties linked by a law must be conceived as dispositional and not necessarily manifest.

Publié le : 2003-01-01

@article{PHSC_2003__7_2_189_0,
     author = {Kistler, Max},
     title = {Laws of nature, exceptions and tropes},
     journal = {Philosophia Scientiae},
     volume = {7},
     year = {2003},
     pages = {189-219},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/PHSC_2003__7_2_189_0}
}

Kistler, Max. Laws of nature, exceptions and tropes. Philosophia Scientiae, Tome 7 (2003) pp. 189-219. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/PHSC_2003__7_2_189_0/

Bibliographie

[1] Armstrong, David M. 1968.- A Materialist Theory of the Mind, London: Routledge, 1993.

[2] Armstrong, David M. 1983.- What is a Law of Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

[3] Armstrong, David M. 1989.- Universals. An Opinionated Introduction, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989.

[4] Armstrong, David M. 1992.- Properties 1992, 14-27 $]$ .

[5] Armstrong, David M. 1997.- A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

[6] Bacon, John 1995.- Universals and Property Instances. The Alphabet of Being, Aristotelian Society Series, Vol. 15, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.

[7] Campbell, Keith 1990.- Abstract Particulars, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.

[8] Canfield, John and Lehrer, Keith 1961.- A Note on Prediction and Deduction, Philosophy of Science, 28, 204-208.

[9] Carnap, Rudolf 1936.- Testability and Meaning, Philosophy of Science, 3, 420-471. | JFM 62.1052.01

[10] Cartwright, Nancy 1983.- How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.

[11] Cartwright, Nancy 1989.- Nature's Capacities and their Measurement, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.

[12] Cartwright, Nancy 1999.- The Dappled World, A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. | MR 1885282 | Zbl 1003.00005

[13] Coffa, José A. 1968.- Discussion: Deductive Predictions, Philosophy of Science 35, 279-283.

[14] Dretske, Fred 1977.- Laws of Nature, Philosophy of Science, 44, 248-268.

[15] Earman John 1984.- Laws of Nature: The Empiricist Challenge 1984, 225-269 $]$ .

[16] Earman John 1993.- In Defence of Laws: Reflections on Bas van Fraassen's Laws and Symmetries, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 413-419.

[17] Ellis, Brian, and Lierse, Caroline 1994.- Dispositional Essentialism, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 27-45.

[18] Ellis, Brian 2001.- Scientific Essentialism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[19] Fuhrmann, André 1991.- Tropes and Laws, Philosophical Studies, 63, 57-82. | MR 1124599

[20] Giere, Ronald N. 1988.- Laws, Theories, and Generalizations 1988, 37-46 $]$ .

[21] Goodman, Nelson 1955.- Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.

[22] Hempel, Carl G. 1965.- Empiricist Criteria of Cognitive Significance: Problems and Changes 1965, 101-122 $]$ . | MR 1461357

[23] Hempel, Carl G. 1988.- Provisos: A Problem Concerning the Inferential Function of Scientific Theories 1988, 19-36 $]$ .

[24] Joseph, Geoffrey 1980.- The Many Sciences and the One World, Journal of Philosophy, 77, 773-791.

[25] Kistler, Max 1999.- Causalité et lois de la nature, Mathesis, Paris : Vrin, 1999.

[26] Kistler, Max 2002a.- The Causal Criterion of Reality and the Necessity of Laws of Nature, Metaphysica, 3 (1), 57-86.

[27] Kistler, Max 2002b.- , L'identité des propriétés et la nécessité des lois de la nature, Cahiers de Philosophie de l'Université de Caen, 38/39 : Le réalisme des universaux., 249-273. forthcoming, Le combinatorialisme et le réalisme nomologique sont-ils compatibles ?, in $[$ Monnoyer, Jean-Maurice (ed.), La structure du monde : objets, propriétés, états de choses, Paris : Vrin $]$ .

[28] Lakatos, Imre 1970.- Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes 1978, 8-101 $]$ . | MR 560905

[29] Lange, Marc 1993.- Natural Laws and the Problem of Provisos, Erkenntnis, 38, 233-248.

[30] Lewis, David 1973.- Counterfactuals, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1973. | MR 421986

[31] Lewis, David 1994.- Humean Supervenience Debugged, Mind, 103, 473-490. | MR 1042241

[32] Lipton, Peter 1999.- All Else Being Equal, Philosophy, 74, 155-168.

[33] Martin, C.B. 1993.- Power for Realists 1993, 175-186 $]$ .

[34] Molnar, George 1999.- Are Dispositions Reducible?, Philosophical Quarterly, 49, 1-17.

[35] Mumford, Stephen 1995.- Ellis and Lierse on Dispositional Essentialism, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 73, 606-612.

[36] Mumford, Stephen 1998a.- Dispositions. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

[37] Mumford, Stephen 1998b.- Laws of Nature Outlawed, Dialectica, 52, 83-101.

[38] Pietroski, Paul and Rey, Georges 1995.- When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46, 81-110. | MR 1319218 | Zbl 0937.03008

[39] Prior, Elizabeth W., Pargetter, Robert and Jackson, Frank 1982.- Three Theses about Dispositions, American Philosophical Quarterly, 19, 251-257.

[40] Ramsey, Frank P. 1929.- General Propositions and Causality 1990, 145-163 $]$ .

[41] Roberts, John 1999.- “Laws of Nature” as an Indexical term: A Reinterpretation of Lewis' Best-System Analysis, Philosophy of Science, 66 (Proceedings), S502-S511.

[42] Schiffer, Stephen 1991.- Ceteris Paribus Laws, Mind, 100, 1-17.

[43] Shoemaker, Sydney 1980.- Causality and Properties 1984, 206-233. $]$

[44] Shoemaker, Sydney 1998.- Causal and Metaphysical Necessity, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79, 59-77.

[45] Simons, Peter 1994.- Particulars in Particular Clothing: Three Trope Theories of Substance, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, 553-575.

[46] Spohn, Wolfgang 1997.- Begründungen a priori - oder: ein frischer Blick auf Dispositionsprädikate323-345 $]$ .

[47] Stegmüller, Wolfgang 1966.- Explanation, Prediction, Scientific Systematization and Non-explanatory Information, Ratio, 8, 1-24.

[48] Tooley, Michael 1977.- The Nature of Laws, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7 (4), 667-698.

[49] Van Fraassen, Bas 1989.- Laws and Symmetry, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. | MR 1243884

[50] Williams, Donald 1953.- On the Elements of Being, Review of Metaphysics, 7, 3-18 and 171-192.

[51] Woodward, James 2000.- Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 197-254.

[52] Woodward, James 2001.- Law and Explanation in Biology: Invariance is the Kind of Stability that Matters, Philosophy of Science, 68, 1-20.