Minimum Propositional Proof Length Is NP-Hard to Linearly Approximate
Alekhnovich, Michael ; Buss, Sam ; Moran, Shlomo ; Pitassi, Toniann
J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 66 (2001) no. 1, p. 171-191 / Harvested from Project Euclid
We prove that the problem of determining the minimum propositional proof length is NP- hard to approximate within a factor of 2$^{log^{1 - o(1)}_n}$. These results are very robust in that they hold for almost all natural proof systems, including: Frege systems, extended Frege systems, resolution, Horn resolution, the polynomial calculus, the sequent calculus, the cut-free sequent calculus, as well as the polynomial calculus. Our hardness of approximation results usually apply to proof length measured either by number of symbols or by number of inferences, for tree-like or dag-like proofs. We introduce the Monotone Minimum (Circuit) Satisfying Assignment problem and reduce it to the problems of approximation of the length of proofs.
Publié le : 2001-03-14
Classification: 
@article{1183746365,
     author = {Alekhnovich, Michael and Buss, Sam and Moran, Shlomo and Pitassi, Toniann},
     title = {Minimum Propositional Proof Length Is NP-Hard to Linearly Approximate},
     journal = {J. Symbolic Logic},
     volume = {66},
     number = {1},
     year = {2001},
     pages = { 171-191},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1183746365}
}
Alekhnovich, Michael; Buss, Sam; Moran, Shlomo; Pitassi, Toniann. Minimum Propositional Proof Length Is NP-Hard to Linearly Approximate. J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 66 (2001) no. 1, pp.  171-191. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1183746365/