Review: David Kaplan, Richard Montague, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic: A Paradox Regained; Martin Gardner, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science: A New Prediction Paradox; K. R. Popper, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science:A Comment on the New Prediction Paradox
Cargile, James
J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 30 (1965) no. 1, p. 102-103 / Harvested from Project Euclid
Text on Project Euclid
PDF
Alt PDF
Publié le : 1965-03-14
Classification:  
@article{1183735061,
     author = {Cargile, James},
     title = {Review: David Kaplan, Richard Montague, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic: A Paradox Regained; Martin Gardner, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science: A New Prediction Paradox; K. R. Popper, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science:A Comment on the New Prediction Paradox},
     journal = {J. Symbolic Logic},
     volume = {30},
     number = {1},
     year = {1965},
     pages = { 102-103},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1183735061}
}

Cargile, James. Review: David Kaplan, Richard Montague, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic: A Paradox Regained; Martin Gardner, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science: A New Prediction Paradox; K. R. Popper, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science:A Comment on the New Prediction Paradox. J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 30 (1965) no. 1, pp.  102-103. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1183735061/