Is the Selected Population the Best?
Gutmann, Sam ; Maymin, Zakhar
Ann. Statist., Tome 15 (1987) no. 1, p. 456-461 / Harvested from Project Euclid
Random variables $X_i \sim N(\theta_i, 1), i = 1,2,\cdots, k$, are observed. Suppose $X_S$ is the largest observation. If the inference $\theta_S > \max_{i\neq S}\theta_i$ is made whenever $X_S - \max_{i\neq S}X_i > c$, then the probability of a false inference is maximized when two $\theta_i$ are equal and the rest are $-\infty$. Equivalently, the inference can be made whenever a two-sample two-sided test for difference of means, based on the largest two observations, would reject the hypothesis of no difference. The result also holds in the case of unknown, estimable, common variance, and in fact for location families with monotone likelihood ratio.
Publié le : 1987-03-14
Classification:  Selection,  retrospective hypotheses,  monotone likelihood ratio,  62F03,  62F07
@article{1176350281,
     author = {Gutmann, Sam and Maymin, Zakhar},
     title = {Is the Selected Population the Best?},
     journal = {Ann. Statist.},
     volume = {15},
     number = {1},
     year = {1987},
     pages = { 456-461},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1176350281}
}
Gutmann, Sam; Maymin, Zakhar. Is the Selected Population the Best?. Ann. Statist., Tome 15 (1987) no. 1, pp.  456-461. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1176350281/