Estimate (3.39) which appears in the proof of Proposition 3.4 in [Ann. Probab. 27 (1999) 1414–1467] is wrong. We present below a corrected proof which introduces an extra factor 2 in equations (3.34) and (3.35). This has no consequence in the rest of the paper since Proposition 3.4 is used to estimate only ratios; see (3.23) and (3.25).
Publié le : 2006-07-14
Classification:
Phase transition,
random walk,
random environment,
Kac potential,
60K35,
82B20,
82B43
@article{1158673333,
author = {Cassandro, Marzio and Orlandi, Enza and Picco, Pierre},
title = {``Typical configuration for one-dimensional random field Kac model''},
journal = {Ann. Probab.},
volume = {34},
number = {1},
year = {2006},
pages = { 1641-1643},
language = {en},
url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1158673333}
}
Cassandro, Marzio; Orlandi, Enza; Picco, Pierre. “Typical configuration for one-dimensional random field Kac model”. Ann. Probab., Tome 34 (2006) no. 1, pp. 1641-1643. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1158673333/