Rejoinder
Bowater, Russell J.
Internat. Statist. Rev., Tome 72 (2004) no. 1, p. 335-336 / Harvested from Project Euclid
I welcome the comments that have been made by Professor Shafer. He makes a number of important points, however, I shall confine this rejoinder by addressing only a selected number of these points. In particular, I would like to use this opportunity to briefly comment on how well I feel the work that has been done by those in the `imprecise probabilities' community, tackles the specific shortcomings of the standard Bayesian approach that have been highlighted in my article.
Publié le : 2004-12-14
Classification: 
@article{1102516475,
     author = {Bowater, Russell J.},
     title = {Rejoinder},
     journal = {Internat. Statist. Rev.},
     volume = {72},
     number = {1},
     year = {2004},
     pages = { 335-336},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1102516475}
}
Bowater, Russell J. Rejoinder. Internat. Statist. Rev., Tome 72 (2004) no. 1, pp.  335-336. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1102516475/