Interpreting DNA Evidence: A Review
Foreman, L.A. ; Champod, C. ; Evett, I.W. ; Lambert, J.A. ; Pope, S.
Internat. Statist. Rev., Tome 71 (2003) no. 3, p. 473-495 / Harvested from Project Euclid
The paper provides a review of current issues relating to the use of DNA profiling in forensic science. A short historical section gives the main statistical milestones that occurred during a rapid development of DNA technology and operational uses. Greater detail is then provided for interpretation issues involving STR DNA profiles, including: ¶ methods that take account of population substructure in DNA calculations; ¶ parallel work carried out by the US National Research Council; ¶ the move away from multiple independence testing in favour of experiments that demonstrate the robustness of casework procedures; ¶ the questionable practice of source attribution `with reasonable scientific certainty'; ¶ the effect on the interpretation of profiles obtained under increasingly sensitive techniques, the LCN technique in particular; ¶ the use of DNA profiles as an intelligence tool; ¶ the interpretation of DNA mixtures. ¶ Experience of presenting DNA evidence within UK courts is also discussed. The paper then summarises a generic interpretation framework based on the concept of likelihood ratio within a hierarchy of propositions. Finally the use of Bayesian networks to interpret DNA evidence is reviewed.
Publié le : 2003-12-14
Classification:  Forensic science,  Interpretation of evidence,  Likelihood ratio,  DNA profile,  DNA mixtures,  Bayesian networks
@article{1066768703,
     author = {Foreman, L.A. and Champod, C. and Evett, I.W. and Lambert, J.A. and Pope, S.},
     title = {Interpreting DNA Evidence: A Review},
     journal = {Internat. Statist. Rev.},
     volume = {71},
     number = {3},
     year = {2003},
     pages = { 473-495},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1066768703}
}
Foreman, L.A.; Champod, C.; Evett, I.W.; Lambert, J.A.; Pope, S. Interpreting DNA Evidence: A Review. Internat. Statist. Rev., Tome 71 (2003) no. 3, pp.  473-495. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1066768703/