Large sample theory for semiparametric regression models with two-phase, outcome dependent sampling
Breslow, Norman ; McNeney, Brad ; Wellner, Jon A.
Ann. Statist., Tome 31 (2003) no. 1, p. 1110-1139 / Harvested from Project Euclid
Outcome-dependent, two-phase sampling designs can dramatically reduce the costs of observational studies by judicious selection of the most informative subjects for purposes of detailed covariate measurement. Here we derive asymptotic information bounds and the form of the efficient score and influence functions for the semiparametric regression models studied by Lawless, Kalbfleisch and Wild (1999) under two-phase sampling designs. We show that the maximum likelihood estimators for both the parametric and nonparametric parts of the model are asymptotically normal and efficient. The efficient influence function for the parametric part agrees with the more general information bound calculations of Robins, Hsieh and Newey (1995). By verifying the conditions of Murphy and van der Vaart (2000) for a least favorable parametric submodel, we provide asymptotic justification for statistical inference based on profile likelihood.
Publié le : 2003-08-14
Classification:  asymptotic distributions,  asymptotic efficiency,  consistency,  covariates,  empirical processes,  information bounds,  least favorable,  maximum likelihood,  missing data,  profile likelihood,  outcome dependent,  stratified sampling,  two-phase,  $Z$-theorem,  60F05,  60F17,  60J65,  60J70
@article{1059655907,
     author = {Breslow, Norman and McNeney, Brad and Wellner, Jon A.},
     title = {Large sample theory for semiparametric regression models with two-phase, outcome dependent sampling},
     journal = {Ann. Statist.},
     volume = {31},
     number = {1},
     year = {2003},
     pages = { 1110-1139},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1059655907}
}
Breslow, Norman; McNeney, Brad; Wellner, Jon A. Large sample theory for semiparametric regression models with two-phase, outcome dependent sampling. Ann. Statist., Tome 31 (2003) no. 1, pp.  1110-1139. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1059655907/