Positive semidefiniteness of estimated covariance matrices in linear models for sample survey data

Stephen Haslett

Special Matrices, Tome 4 (2016), p. 218-224 / Harvested from The Polish Digital Mathematics Library

Résumé

Descriptive analysis of sample survey data estimates means, totals and their variances in a design framework. When analysis is extended to linear models, the standard design-based method for regression parameters includes inverse selection probabilities as weights, ignoring the joint selection probabilities. When joint selection probabilities are included to improve estimation, and the error covariance is not a diagonal matrix, the unbiased sample based estimator of the covariance is the Hadamard product of the population covariance, the elementwise inverse of selection probabilities and joint selection probabilities, and a sample selection matrix of rank equal to the sample size. This Hadamard product is however not always positive definite, which has implications for best linear unbiased estimation. Conditions under which a change in covariance structure leaves BLUEs and/or BLUPs are known. Interestingly, this class of “equivalent” matrices for linear models includes non-positive semi-definite matrices. The paper uses these results to explore how the estimated covariance from the sample can be modified so that it meets necessary conditions to be positive semidefinite, while retaining the property that fitting a linear model to the sampled data yields the same BLUEs and/or BLUPs as when the original Hadamard product is used.

Détail

Publié le : 2016-01-01

Zbl 06583675

EUDML-ID : urn:eudml:doc:277101

Bibliographie

[1] D. Basu. An essay on the logical foundations of survey sampling, Part One, In Foundations of Statistical Inference, V.P. Godambe and D.A. Sprott (eds). Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 203-242, 1971.

[2] C-M. Cassel, C.E Särndal, J.H. Wretman. Foundations of Inference in Survey Sampling, Wiley, 1977. | Zbl 0391.62007

[3] R.L. Chambers, C.J. Skinner (eds.). Analysis of Survey Data, Wiley, 2003.

[4] W.G. Cochran. Sampling Techniques, Wiley, 1953.

[5] W.G. Cochran. Sampling Techniques, 3rd edition, Wiley, 1977. | Zbl 0353.62011

[6] S. Fisk. A very short proof of Cauchy’s interlace theorem for eigenvalues of Hermitian matrices, arXiv:math/0502408v1

[math.CA] 18 Feb 2005, http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0502408v1.pdf, 2005.

[7] W.A. Fuller. Sampling Statistics, Wiley, 2009.

[8] M.H. Hansen, W.N. Hurwitz, W.G. Madow. Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Volumes 1 and 2, Wiley, 1953. | Zbl 0052.14801

[9] S. Haslett. The linear non-homogeneous estimator in sample surveys, Sankhyä Ser. B, 47(1985), 101-117. | Zbl 0589.62008

[10] S. Haslett, S. Puntanen. Equality of the BLUEs and/or BLUPs under two linear models using stochastic restrictions, Statistical Papers, 51(2010), 465-475. [WoS][Crossref] | Zbl 1247.62167

[11] D.G. Horvitz, D.J. Thompson. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(1952) 663-685. [Crossref] | Zbl 0047.38301

[12] R. Lehtonen, E. Pahkinen. Practical Methods for Design and Analysis of Complex Surveys, 2nd Edition, Wiley, 2003. | Zbl 0867.62004

[13] A. Mercer, P. Mercer. Cauchy’s interlace theorem and lower bounds for the spectral radius, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 23(2000), 563-566. | Zbl 0955.15007

[14] C.R. Rao. A note on a previous lemma in the theory of least squares and some further results, Sankhyä Ser. A 30(1968), 259-266. | Zbl 0197.15802

[15] R.M. Royal, W.G.Cumberland. Variance estimation in finite population sampling, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(1978) 351-358. [Crossref]

[16] C-E. Särndal, B. Swensson, J. Wretman. Model Assisted Survey Sampling, Springer, 1992. | Zbl 0742.62008

[17] C.J. Skinner, D. Holt, T.M.F. Smith (eds.). Analysis of Complex Surveys, Wiley, 1989. | Zbl 0701.62018