Adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with several treatments
Anthony C. Atkinson
Discussiones Mathematicae Probability and Statistics, Tome 24 (2004), p. 85-108 / Harvested from The Polish Digital Mathematics Library

Adaptive designs are used in phase III clinical trials for skewing the allocation pattern towards the better treatments. We use optimum design theory to provide a skewed biased-coin procedure for sequential designs with continuous responses. The skewed designs are used to provide adaptive designs, the performance of which is studied numerically for designs with three treatments. Important properties are loss and the proportion of allocation to inferior treatments. Regularisation to provide consistent parameter estimates greatly improves both these properties.

Publié le : 2004-01-01
EUDML-ID : urn:eudml:doc:287699
@article{bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-doi-10_7151_dmps_1048,
     author = {Anthony C. Atkinson},
     title = {Adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with several treatments},
     journal = {Discussiones Mathematicae Probability and Statistics},
     volume = {24},
     year = {2004},
     pages = {85-108},
     zbl = {1053.62121},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-doi-10_7151_dmps_1048}
}
Anthony C. Atkinson. Adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with several treatments. Discussiones Mathematicae Probability and Statistics, Tome 24 (2004) pp. 85-108. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-doi-10_7151_dmps_1048/

[000] [1] A.B. Antognini and A. Giovagnoli, On the large sample optimality of sequential designs for comparing two treatments, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 167 (2004) (in press). | Zbl 1074.62048

[001] [2] A.C. Atkinson, Optimum biased coin designs for sequential clinical trials with prognostic factors, Biometrika 69 (1982), 61-67. | Zbl 0483.62067

[002] [3] A.C. Atkinson, Optimum biased-coin designs for sequential treatment allocation with covariate information, Statistics in Medicine 18 (1999), 1741-1752.

[003] [4] A.C. Atkinson, The comparison of designs for sequential clinical trials with covariate information, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 165, (2002), 349-373. | Zbl 1001.62522

[004] [5] A.C. Atkinson, The distribution of loss in two-treatment biased-coin designs, Biostatistics 4 (2003), 179-193. | Zbl 1139.62330

[005] [6] A.C. Atkinson and A. Biswas, Bayesian adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with normal responses, (2004) (Submitted). | Zbl 1077.62064

[006] [7] A.C. Atkinson and A. Biswas, Optimum design theory and adaptive-biased coin designs for skewing the allocation proportion in clinical trials, (2004) (Submitted).

[007] [8] F.G. Ball, A.F.M. Smith and I. Verdinelli, Biased coin designs with a Bayesian bias, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 34 (1993), 403-421.

[008] [9] U. Bandyopadhyay and A. Biswas, Adaptive designs for normal responses with prognostic factors, Biometrika 88 (2001), 409-419. | Zbl 0984.62054

[009] [10] C.-F. Burman, On Sequential Treatment Allocations in Clinical Trials, Göteborg: Department of Mathematics (1996).

[010] [11] D.R. Cox, A note on design when response has an exponential family distribution, Biometrika 75 (1988), 161-164. | Zbl 0635.62083

[011] [12] B. Efron, Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced, Biometrika 58 (1971), 403-417. | Zbl 0226.62086

[012] [13] J.N. Matthews, An Introduction to Randomized Controlled Clinical Tials, London: Edward Arnold (2000). | Zbl 0959.62101

[013] [14] W.F. Rosenberger and J.L. Lachin, Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice, New York: Wiley (2002). | Zbl 1007.62091

[014] [15] W.F. Rosenberger, N. Stallard, A. Ivanova, C.N. Harper and M.L. Ricks, Optimal adaptive designs for binary response trials, Biometrics 57 (2002), 909-913. | Zbl 1209.62181