Many numerical simulations in (bilinear) quantum control use the monotonically convergent Krotov algorithms (introduced by Tannor et al. [Time Dependent Quantum Molecular Dynamics (1992) 347-360]), Zhu and Rabitz [J. Chem. Phys. (1998) 385-391] or their unified form described in Maday and Turinici [J. Chem. Phys. (2003) 8191-8196]. In Maday et al. [Num. Math. (2006) 323-338], a time discretization which preserves the property of monotonicity has been presented. This paper introduces a proof of the convergence of these schemes and some results regarding their rate of convergence.
@article{M2AN_2007__41_1_77_0, author = {Salomon, Julien}, title = {Convergence of the time-discretized monotonic schemes}, journal = {ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Mod\'elisation Math\'ematique et Analyse Num\'erique}, volume = {41}, year = {2007}, pages = {77-93}, doi = {10.1051/m2an:2007008}, mrnumber = {2323691}, zbl = {1124.65059}, language = {en}, url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/M2AN_2007__41_1_77_0} }
Salomon, Julien. Convergence of the time-discretized monotonic schemes. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique, Tome 41 (2007) pp. 77-93. doi : 10.1051/m2an:2007008. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/M2AN_2007__41_1_77_0/
[1] Exponential split operator methods for solving coupled time-dependent Schrödinger equations. J. Chem. Phys. 99 (1993) 1185-1193.
and ,[2] Local controllability of a 1D Schrödinger equation. J. Math. Pures Appl. 84 (2005) 851-956. | Zbl 1124.93009
,[3] On the convergence of the proximal point algorithm for nonsmooth functions involving analytic features. Math. Program. (to appear). | MR 2421270
and ,[4] Some mathematical and algorithmic challenges in the control of quantum dynamics phenomena. J. Math. Chem. 31 (2002) 17-63. | Zbl 0996.81001
and ,[5] Rate of decay to equilibrium in some semilinear parabolic equations. J. Evol. Equ. 3 (2003) 463-484. | Zbl 1036.35035
, and ,[6] Optimal bilinear control of an abstract Schrödinger equation. SIAM J. Cont. Opt. (to appear). | MR 2299629 | Zbl 1136.35089
and ,[7] Teaching lasers to control molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett 68 10 (1992) 1500-1503.
and ,[8] Une propriété topologique des sous-ensembles analytiques réels. Colloques internationaux du CNRS, Les équations aux dérivées partielles 117 (1963). | Zbl 0234.57007
,[9] Sur la géométrie semi- et sous-analytique. Ann. Inst. Fourier 43 (1993) 1575-1595. | Numdam | Zbl 0803.32002
,[10] New formulations of monotonically convergent quantum control algorithms. J. Chem. Phys 118 18 (2003) 8191-8196.
and ,[11] Discretely monotonically convergent algorithm in quantum control, in Proc. LHMNLC03 IFAC conference, Sevilla (2003) 321-324.
, and ,[12] Monotonic time-discretized schemes in quantum control. Num. Math. 103 (2006) 323-338. | Zbl 1095.65058
, and ,[13] Control of quantum dynamics: Concepts, procedures and future prospects, in Computational Chemistry, Special Volume (C. Le Bris Editor) of Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Vol. X, edited by Ph.G. Ciarlet, Elsevier Science B.V. (2003). | MR 2008399 | Zbl 1066.81015
, and ,[14] Limit points of the monotonic schemes in quantum control, in Proc. 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sevilla (2005).
,[15] Optimal control of selective vibrational excitation in harmonic linear chain molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 88 (1988) 6870-6883.
, and ,[16] Accurate partial difference methods. I: Linear cauchy problems. Arch. Rat. Mech. An. 12 (1963) 392-402. | Zbl 0113.32303
,[17] Absorbing boundary conditions for nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Num. Math. 104 (2006) 103-127. | Zbl 1130.35119
,[18] Control of photochemical branching: Novel procedures for finding optimal pulses and global upper bounds, in Time Dependent Quantum Molecular Dynamics, J. Broeckhove, L. Lathouwers Eds., Plenum (1992) 347-360.
, and ,[19] A comparative study of time dependent quantum mechanical wave packet evolution methods. J. Chem. Phys. 96 (1992) 2077-2084.
, , , , , and ,[20] A rapid monotonically convergent iteration algorithm for quantum optimal control over the expectation value of a positive definite operator. J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 385-391.
and ,