@article{AIHPA_1968__9_4_327_0, author = {Limi\'c, N. and Niederle, J.}, title = {Reduction of the most degenerate unitary irreductible representations of $SO\_0 (m, n)$ when restricted to a non-compact rotation subgroup}, journal = {Annales de l'I.H.P. Physique th\'eorique}, volume = {8}, year = {1968}, pages = {327-355}, mrnumber = {240240}, zbl = {0172.27601}, language = {en}, url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/AIHPA_1968__9_4_327_0} }
Limić, N.; Niederle, J. Reduction of the most degenerate unitary irreductible representations of $SO_0 (m, n)$ when restricted to a non-compact rotation subgroup. Annales de l'I.H.P. Physique théorique, Tome 8 (1968) pp. 327-355. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/AIHPA_1968__9_4_327_0/
[1] See for example
13, 1964, p. 698; t. 14, 1965, p. 48. | Zbl 0126.24701
, , and , Phys. Rev. Letters, t.135, 1964, B 839. | MR 175551
, Phys. Rev., t.14, 1965, p. 968. | MR 180210 | Zbl 0135.44802
, , Phys. Rev. Letters, t.15, 1965, p. 35. | MR 195481 | Zbl 0127.20803
, and , Phys. Rev. Letters, t.17, 1965, p. 148. | MR 183410
, and , Phys. Letters, t.7, 1936, p. 1932; Phys. Rev. Letters, t. 15, 1965, p. 939. | Zbl 0168.23701
, , J. Math. Phys., t.Proc. of the Third Coral Gables Conference, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1966.
,15, 1965, p. 1041. | MR 191448
, and , Phys. Rev. Letters, t.Relativistic Wave Equations for Particles with Internal Structure and Mass Spectrum, University of Chicago, preprint 1966. | Zbl 0161.23203
,Proceedings of the Milwaukee Conference of Non-compact groups in Particle Physics, (editor), W. A. Benjamin and Co., New York, 1966. | Zbl 0148.00205
16, 1966, p. 210. | MR 195489
, Phys. Rev. Letters, t.The SU(6) Model and its Relativistic Generalizations, CERN report 66/1106-5-Th 709, 1966.
, and ,284 A, 1965, p. 146. | MR 172636
, and , Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), t.Proc. of the Third Coral Gables Conference, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1966.
,[2] 10, 1962, p. 65 and Lectures in Theoretical Physics, vol. VII A, p. 132, Boulder, University of Colorado, edited by W. E. Brittin and A. O. Barut, 1965. | MR 195408
, Fortschr. d. Phys., t.33, 1964, p. 413. | MR 187682
and , Nuovo Cimento, t.37, 1965, p. 631. | MR 194073
, Nuovo Cimento, t.44, 1966, p. 185.
, Nuovo Cimento, t.8, 1967, p. 675.
, J. Math. Phys., t.[3] 6, 1965, p. 1534. | MR 182376 | Zbl 0134.03401
, J. Math. Phys., t.8, 1967, p. 489. | MR 213478 | Zbl 0158.03102
and , J. Math. Phys., t.Unitary representation of SO(p, q), SU(p, q) groups. University of Vienna prepreint, 1965.
,[4] 8, 1968, p. 1921. | Zbl 0173.30103
, J. Math. Phys., t.[5] 8, 1967, p. 170. | Zbl 0149.21703
, J. Math. Phys., t.On the decomposition of the unitary representations of the group SL(2, c) restricted to the subgroup SU(1, 1). Internal report No. 108, Istituto di Fisica « G. Marconi »;, Roma, 1966.
and ,Unitary representations of the group SO(2, 1) in an SO(1, 1) basis. Syracuse University preprint 1206-SU-103, Syracuse, 1967. | MR 223489
,Unitary Representations of the Homogeneous Lorentz Group in an SO(2, 1) basis. Syracuse University preprint 1206-SU-106, Syracuse, 1967.
,Zero mass representations of the Poincaré group in an SO(3, 1) basis. Syracuse University preprint 1206-SU-107, Syracuse, 1967.
,Unitary Representations of the Lorentz group: Reduction of the Supplementary Series under a Non-compact Subgroup. Syracuse University preprint 1206-SU-112, Syracuse, 1967. | MR 227317
,On the Supplementary Series of Representations of Semi-simple Non-compact Groups. ICTP Internal Report 15/1967, Trieste, 1967.
,The Physical Aspects of the Conformal Group SO0(4, 2). ICTP preprint IC/67/66, Trieste, 1967.
,[6] 7, 1966, p. 1861. | MR 206146 | Zbl 0163.22802
, , , J. Math. Phys., t.[7] 7, 1966, p. 2026. | MR 206147 | Zbl 0158.45805
, , , J. Math. Phys., t.[8] 8, 1967, p. 1091. | MR 218487
, and , J. Math. Phys., t.[9] The group G is unimodular if | det AdG(g) | = 1 for all g ∈ G, where AdG(g) is the automorphism of the Lie algebra g of the group G defined by AdG(g): g ∋ X → AdG(g)X = dI(g)eX and I(g) is the inner isomorphism of G onto itself. The group SO0(r, s) is a semi-simple (in fact simple) Lie group, hence unimodular. For the group G = Tm+n-2 s SO0(m - 1, n - 1) we also have | det AdG(g) | = 1, as follows from the following argument. G is a connected group and therefore every neighbourhood U(e) of the identity element e ∈ G generates the whole group G. As G ∋ g → Ad(g) ∈ GL(g) is the homomorphism, it suffices to prove that | det Ad(g) | = 1 for a g ∈ U(e). We choose such U(e) for which a neighbourhood V(o) ∈ g exists such that V(0) ∋ X → exp X ∈ U(e) is the diffeomorphism. Then for every g = exp X ∈ U(e) we have | det Ad (exp X) | = exp { TradX }. In the basis of the Lie algebra of the considered group G, which is the union of the basis of Lie algebras of the groups Tm+n-2 and SO0(m - 1, n - 1), one easily calculates that Tr adX = 0.
[10] L'intégration dans les groupes topologiques et ses applications. Hermann, Paris, 1940. See also , Differential Geometry and Symmetric Spaces, Academic Press, New York and London, 1962. | JFM 66.1205.02 | Zbl 0063.08195
,[11] The Hilbert space h(M) is a Hilbert space vector of which the equivalence classes of complex valued measurable functions f(p) on M such that and the scalar product is defined by Addition of vectors and multiplication of vectors by complex numbers is defined as the corresponding operations with the complex valued functions.
[12] The invariant C2 is a Casimir operator gμνXμXν where gμν is the Cartan metric tensor of the Lie algebra s0(m, n) in a basis X1, X2, ..., X[m+n 2].
[13] Here and elsewhere we use brackets for indices defined as follows:
[14] For instance all UI representations of the group SO0(m, n) m ≥ n ≥ 2 related with three homogeneous spaces M which are classified by the same real number λ ∈ (0, ∞) and the same eigenvalue of the operator P are equivalent.
[15] Eigenfunction expansions, Part I, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1962. | MR 176151 | Zbl 0099.05201
,[16] Special functions and theory of group representation, NA UKA, Moscow, 1965 (In Russian). | MR 209523
,