Peirce and Frege, a question unanswered
Hawkins, Benjamin S.
Mod. Log., Tome 3 (1993) no. 2, p. 376-383 / Harvested from Project Euclid
Text on Project Euclid
PDF
Alt PDF
The apparent absence, in reference or allusion, of Peirce to Frege and of Frege to Peirce, to work of the one in work of the other, and vice versa, would suggest — probably or even plausibly that neither Peirce nor Frege were aware of the other's work. It nevertheless seems almost inconceivable that Peirce and Frege could have been unaware of the the other's work, with circumstantial evidence available that would favour some likelihood of such awareness. This paper collates and speculates about the circumstantial evidence that is available.
Publié le : 1993-10-15
Classification:  01A55,  01A60,  03-03 
@article{1204835119,
     author = {Hawkins, Benjamin S.},
     title = {Peirce and Frege, a question unanswered},
     journal = {Mod. Log.},
     volume = {3},
     number = {2},
     year = {1993},
     pages = { 376-383},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1204835119}
}

Hawkins, Benjamin S. Peirce and Frege, a question unanswered. Mod. Log., Tome 3 (1993) no. 2, pp.  376-383. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1204835119/