We study the proof-theoretic strength and effective content of the infinite form of Ramsey's theorem for pairs. Let RT$^n_k$ denote Ramsey's theorem for k-colorings of n-element sets, and let RT$^n_{<\infty}$ denote ($\forall k)RT^n_k$. Our main result on computability is: For any n $\geq$ 2 and any computable (recursive) k-coloring of the n-element sets of natural numbers, there is an infinite homogeneous set X with X'' $\leq_T 0^{(n)}$. Let $I\Sigma_n$ and $B\Sigma_n$ denote the $\Sigma_n$ induction and bounding schemes, respectively. Adapting the case n = 2 of the above result (where X is low$_2$) to models of arithmetic enables us to show that $RCA_0 + I\Sigma_2 + RT^2_2$ is conservative over $RCA_0 + I\Sigma_2$ for $\Pi^1_1$ statements and that $RCA_0 + I\Sigma_3 + RT^2_{<\infty}$, is $\Pi^1_1$-conservative over $RCA_0 + I\Sigma_3$. It follows that $RCA_0 + RT^2_2$ does not imply $B\Sigma_3$. In contrast, J. Hirst showed that $RCA_0 + RT^2_{<\infty}$ does imply $B\Sigma_3$, and we include a proof of a slightly strengthened version of this result. It follows that $RT^2_{<\infty}$ is strictly stronger than $RT^2_2$ over $RCA_0$.
@article{1183746359,
author = {Cholak, Peter A. and Jockusch, Carl G. and Slaman, Theodore A.},
title = {On the Strength of Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs},
journal = {J. Symbolic Logic},
volume = {66},
number = {1},
year = {2001},
pages = { 1-55},
language = {en},
url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1183746359}
}
Cholak, Peter A.; Jockusch, Carl G.; Slaman, Theodore A. On the Strength of Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs. J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 66 (2001) no. 1, pp. 1-55. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1183746359/