Derivation Rules as Anti-Axioms in Modal Logic
Venema, Yde
J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 58 (1993) no. 1, p. 1003-1034 / Harvested from Project Euclid
We discuss a `negative' way of defining frame classes in (multi)modal logic, and address the question of whether these classes can be axiomatized by derivation rules, the `non-$\xi$ rules', styled after Gabbay's Irreflexivity Rule. The main result of this paper is a metatheorem on completeness, of the following kind: If $\Lambda$ is a derivation system having a set of axioms that are special Sahlqvist formulas and $\Lambda^+$ is the extension of $\Lambda$ with a set of non-$\xi$ rules, then $\Lambda^+$ is strongly sound and complete with respect to the class of frames determined by the axioms and the rules.
Publié le : 1993-09-14
Classification:  (multi)modal logic,  completeness,  derivation rules,  modal definability,  03B45,  03C90
@article{1183744310,
     author = {Venema, Yde},
     title = {Derivation Rules as Anti-Axioms in Modal Logic},
     journal = {J. Symbolic Logic},
     volume = {58},
     number = {1},
     year = {1993},
     pages = { 1003-1034},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1183744310}
}
Venema, Yde. Derivation Rules as Anti-Axioms in Modal Logic. J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 58 (1993) no. 1, pp.  1003-1034. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1183744310/