Review: B. Meltzer, The Third Possibility; B. Meltzer, I. J. Good, Two Forms of the Prediction Paradox; William H. Halberstadt, In Defence of Euclid: A Reply to B. Meltzer
Anderson, Alan Ross
J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 35 (1970) no. 1, p. 458-459 / Harvested from Project Euclid
Text on Project Euclid
PDF
Alt PDF
Publié le : 1970-09-14
Classification:  
@article{1183737285,
     author = {Anderson, Alan Ross},
     title = {Review: B. Meltzer, The Third Possibility; B. Meltzer, I. J. Good, Two Forms of the Prediction Paradox; William H. Halberstadt, In Defence of Euclid: A Reply to B. Meltzer},
     journal = {J. Symbolic Logic},
     volume = {35},
     number = {1},
     year = {1970},
     pages = { 458-459},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1183737285}
}

Anderson, Alan Ross. Review: B. Meltzer, The Third Possibility; B. Meltzer, I. J. Good, Two Forms of the Prediction Paradox; William H. Halberstadt, In Defence of Euclid: A Reply to B. Meltzer. J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 35 (1970) no. 1, pp.  458-459. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1183737285/