Cardinal-preserving extensions
Friedman, Sy D.
J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 68 (2003) no. 1, p. 1163-1170 / Harvested from Project Euclid
A classic result of Baumgartner-Harrington-Kleinberg implies that assuming CH a stationary subset of ω1 has a CUB subset in a cardinal-perserving generic extension of V, via a forcing of cardinality ω1. Therefore, assuming that ω2L is countable: { X ∈ L | X⊆ ω1L and X has a CUB subset in a cardinal-preserving extension of L} is constructible, as it equals the set of constructible subsets of ω1L which in L are stationary. Is there a similar such result for subsets of ω2L? Building on work of M. Stanley, we show that there is not. We shall also consider a number of related problems, examining the extent to which they are “solvable” in the above sense, as well as defining a notion of reduction between them.
Publié le : 2003-12-14
Classification:  Descriptive set theory,  large cardinals,  innermodels,  03E35,  03E45,  03E55
@article{1067620178,
     author = {Friedman, Sy D.},
     title = {Cardinal-preserving extensions},
     journal = {J. Symbolic Logic},
     volume = {68},
     number = {1},
     year = {2003},
     pages = { 1163-1170},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1067620178}
}
Friedman, Sy D. Cardinal-preserving extensions. J. Symbolic Logic, Tome 68 (2003) no. 1, pp.  1163-1170. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1067620178/