This paper discusses the statistical issues that arise in conducting an economic damages
analysis in the context of a litigation matter involving copyrights. Calculating damages
in copyright cases turns out to be a natural application for econometric modelling
methods. Surprisingly, elementary statistical issues can be a source of significant debate
between the experts in such matters. In this paper, we present a case study and illustrate
how issues such as interpretation of $p$-values and what "rejection of the null hypothesis"
really "means" in such matters.