The performance of multiple test procedures with respect to error
control is an old issue. Assuming that all hypotheses are true we investigate
the behavior of the expected number of type I errors (ENE) as a characteristic
of certain multiple tests controlling the familywise error rate (FWER) or the
false discovery rate (FDR) at a prespecified level. We derive explicit formulas
for the distribution of the number of false rejections as well as for the ENE
for single-step, step-down and step-up procedures based on independent
$p$-values. Moreover, we determine the corresponding asymptotic distributions
of the number of false rejections as well as explicit formulae for the ENE if
the number of hypotheses tends to infinity. In case of FWER-control we mostly
obtain Poisson distributions and in one case a geometric distribution as
limiting distributions; in case of FDR control we obtain limiting distributions
which are apparently not named in the literature. Surprisingly, the ENE is
bounded by a small number regardless of the number of hypotheses under
consideration. Finally, it turns out that in case of dependent test statistics
the ENE behaves completely differently compared to the case of independent test
statistics.
Publié le : 2002-02-14
Classification:
Asymptotic critical value behavior,
Ballot theorem,
Bolshev’s recursion,
Bonferroni test procedure,
Dempster’s formula, DKW inequality,
empirical distribution function,
familywise error rate,
false discovery rate,
independent $p$ -values,
Lagrange–Bürmann theorem,
multiple comparisons,
multiple level,
multiple test procedure,
order statistics,
Schur–Jabotinski theorem,
step-down test,
step-up test,
62J15,
62F05,
62F03,
60F99
@article{1015362191,
author = {Finner, H. and Roters, M.},
title = {Multiple hypotheses testing and expected number of type I.
errors},
journal = {Ann. Statist.},
volume = {30},
number = {1},
year = {2002},
pages = { 220-238},
language = {en},
url = {http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1015362191}
}
Finner, H.; Roters, M. Multiple hypotheses testing and expected number of type I.
errors. Ann. Statist., Tome 30 (2002) no. 1, pp. 220-238. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/1015362191/